Tokenomics
Supply model, allocation breakdown, and economic design for the MARK token. Intentionally simple. Publicly documented. On-chain verifiable.
Supply Model
The MARK token has a permanently fixed supply. All tokens are created at the moment of contract deployment. There is no mechanism to create or destroy tokens programmatically.
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Supply | 100,000,000 MARK |
| Decimals | 18 |
| Supply Type | Fixed — no minting or inflation |
| Burn Mechanism | None (voluntary dead-address sends only) |
| Transfer Tax | 0% |
| Standard | ERC-20 + EIP-2612 Permit |
Supply Allocation
Allocation is straightforward and documented before launch. There are three allocations with no hidden buckets.
| Allocation | Amount | Percentage | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEX Liquidity | 50,000,000 | 50% | Paired with ETH in the primary DEX pool |
| Project Operations | 35,000,000 | 35% | Development, integrations, community incentives, contingency |
| Founder | 15,000,000 | 15% | Founder allocation with publicly committed schedule |
Liquidity Strategy
50% of the MARK supply is allocated to the initial DEX liquidity pool, paired with ETH.
Key Facts
- Primary DEX: Uniswap V3 or Aerodrome on Base
- Trading pair: MARK/ETH
- LP tokens will be locked for a minimum of 6–12 months
- LP lock transaction and proof URL will be published
- Lock provider: Team.Finance, Unicrypt, or equivalent reputable service
What This Means
Once liquidity is locked, the paired MARK tokens and ETH cannot be withdrawn until the lock expires. This provides assurance that the liquidity pool will persist for the lock duration. It does not guarantee the token's price, trading volume, or continued project activity.
What You Should Not Infer
Tokenomics documents in crypto are often used to imply value that does not exist. To be clear:
- Allocation percentages do not imply market value or future price
- "Fixed supply" does not mean the price will increase — it means no new tokens can be created
- The operations allocation is not locked by code and relies on the founder's commitment
- No vesting contract exists at launch — this is a known credibility gap
- The token's purpose is tied to a product (attestation registry) that does not yet exist
- Having tokenomics documented does not make the token an investment product